Educational Background on Empathy Quotient-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss about the Gender Educational Background on Empathy Quotient. Answer: Background or definition of the study The study is concentrated on the effects of gender and the educational background on the quotient of empathy. This have been established through a research that has been conducted of the females and the medical students. Empathy has different views and different perspectives. While studying it in an individual manner empathy has been studied as a personality indicator. It is defined as the ability of an individual to understand and most importantly to share the feelings of others (Lyons, Brewer Bethell, 2017). There is a huge difference between empathy and sympathy. Sympathy is to sympathize with the individuals who are suffering from a hard situation. Empathy is to feel the same for the person who was going through the harsh situation. Empathy involves the response towards the identification of the problems an individual goes through and respond to the same situation. It is evident that the quotient of empathy was more in the females than the men and it was more in the medical stud ents than the others. Even in the medical field empathy was more evident among the females than the males (Jacobs et al., 2016). The report constitutes the earlier research that was conducted on this and it also includes the present research that was conducted on this. The research showed that the students who preferred people-oriented specialties scored higher on the empathy quotient. The research was conducted by applying the primary method of research. Previous Research on this topic According to Baron-Cohen Wheelwright (2004), this is not a contemporary issue. The research on this topic has been done since a longer period of time. There is a difference between the earlier research and the current research. The earlier research showed that the females showed significant higher score on the Empathy quotient than the males. According to Guilera, Batalla Soler-Gonzlez (2017), the medical students usually show a greater level of empathy than the other students. It is evident in the field of nursing. Empathy refers to a kind of cognitive quality in the nursing profession. The nurses understands the emotions of the patients and they try to communicate with the patients in the way the patients want it. This is the reason one of the significant result of the research included the fact that the students who prefer the people-oriented specialties scored higher on empathy. The further research of the topic showed the fact that the female students were more empathetic than the male students who were from the medical background. This was proved by using the primary method of research that is by using the questionnaire. Problems with Past Research There were few problems that were faced in the earlier research process. The earlier research was based on the primary method that included circulating the link of the questionnaire to the participants. There was technical glitch in the system. It was found in many case that the link did not open and the participants could not participate in the research. The other problem was that the participants had to give their answers through the scoring keys as a result they could not express anything if they wished to. As a result the findings of the research was not accurate. It was difficult to find the accurate result of the research. Apart from this the two-way anova process of research was used that proved to be a complicated process. It is time-consuming and a difficult process. The one-way anova process is easier than the two-way anova process. These were the primary problems found in the research process apart from these, the number of participants for the research were less. The resu lt of the research would be more appropriate if there would be an increased amount of participants (Kidron et al., 2018). Present research According to Ferri et al. (2015), the current study aims at making a research of the fact that the females are more empathetic than the males and the medical students proved to be more empathetic than the non-medical students. It further proved through the research that the medical female students were the most empathetic. This is the reason it can be said that empathy had a huge influence on the gender as well as the educational background. The recent research has observed the fact that the social interaction had a major role to play in the context of empathy. The students who study social studies shows higher amount of empathy and the students who studies business shows much empathy than the students who studies technology. The reason for this is the social interaction. The person who will be involved in more social interaction will show more empathy. The female shows more empathy because of the maternal nature they acquire since their birth. Therefore, it can be concluded by sayin g that the gender and the educational background have a huge influence on the empathy quotient. References Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 34(2), 163-175. Ferri, P., Guerra, E., Marcheselli, L., Cunico, L., Di Lorenzo, R. (2015). Empathy and burnout: an analytic cross-sectional study among nurses and nursing students.ACTA BIO-MEDICA DE L'ATENEO PARMENSE,86(Supplemento 2), 104-115. Guilera, T., Batalla, I., Soler-Gonzlez, J. (2017). Empathy and specialty preference in medical students. Follow-up study and feedback. Educacin Mdical Jacobs, E. L., deJongh Curry, A. L., Deaton, R. J., Astrone-Figari, C., Strohmer, D. C. (2016). Empathy and Gender Inequity in Engineering Disciplines. Kidron, R., Kaganovskiy, L., Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Empathizing-systemizing cognitive styles: Effects of sex and academic degree.PloS one,13(3), e0194515. Lyons, M. T., Brewer, G., Bethell, E. J. (2017). Sex-Specific Effect of Recalled Parenting on Affective and Cognitive Empathy in Adulthood.Current Psychology,36(2), 236-241.